In this way, reviewers such as David Sewell, see that the resulting, "idiosyncratic babel is not trash." Yet Sewell does help to point out where Young, "entrusts the not serious or not really interesting with a seriousness/prominence/presence it doesn't really deserve." Thus poems such as, "Ode to Hangover" might very well fall into this category. While the poem accurately portrays the inability of an ode to capture modern day existence, it focuses on the elation of the mundane with questioning importance, "After her I could eat a car but here's/a pineapple/clam pizza and Chinese milkshake/ yum but Hangover, you make me aspire/ to a saltine." As if the humor and importance of such an act of defying traditional poetics grows weary with every line.
Yet Sewell does well to point out the imagination and riskiness of Young's work, "Lives of the Surge Protectors" emerges for me as beautiful obliteration, flying through an ambiguity of narration, plot, grammar that ends in the beauty of the new. In fact to quote it does away with its ravenous pace and fluidity, regardless I present its first "sentence."
When she said what she said I
get out change the locks get
drunk fucked out detach drum
whocome howwhich no so I go
program the robot like I always do
in a loud den of panged sentinels
highlit and lifting off the page like
little wolves of italics orchestrating
the ephemeral, eflorescent As if
with blutzed butanes and all you hear
is snow, false as only facts can be.
Young presents an incredibly innovative and albeit beautiful description of anger, as if the words themselves lose their ability to grapple with their content, "drunk fucked" "whocome" "howwhich," ending with the powerful line, "false as only facts can be." Indeed nothing is factual in Young's work. It is the very essence of the surreal, in its attempt to come to terms with the world around it in new more meaningful ways. In this way Sewell's final point finds some commonality, "The poems always seem to be flying away--from easy sense making, from themselves, from us." Their break from tradition explores the heart of its inability and displays the non-linear, non-sensical ways in which existence presents itself.
"Surge Protectors" keeps coming up in people's posts, which fascinates me. In part, I think, because it is exactly this type of DY poem that Gallagher accuses Hoagland of hiding from us in his essay.
ReplyDelete~Robert
Conor – I think you characterized Young’s creative intentions quite well in the first paragraph of your response: “Thus Young's poetry flows out in a style that shows the non-linearity of life…As in the way the surrealists saw the horrors of World War I and the inability for old methods of art to produce meaning, Young seeks to show the inability of narrative and tradition to convey ‘reason’” The piece you referenced, “Lives of the Surge Protectors” is what I see as an excellent example of Young’s attempt to create meaning. As you point out, the “meaning” that emanates from Young’s poetry has a different type of significance, one that appeals to the subconscious more than the conscious. The effect on the reader produces a sensation of (deliberate) chaos. Young’s creative phrases: “howwhich,” “whocome,” as grammatically incorrect as they appear, seem eerily “normal” from an abstract perspective—like the words that bounce around in my head before I type the keys that set them in the proper order on the page. Young’s filter is gone, and as a result, he can combine words to give them entirely new meanings (i.e. “howwhich” is not “how” and “which,” but rather, is indicative of overwhelming confusion). Young is like a famous painter who splatters paint on the canvas. I see more evidence of this freeflow, auto-pilot type writing in another one of Young’s poems, “Hangover:” “…Alas I feel like something spit out by a duck, a duck / other ducks are ashamed of when I only / tried to protect myself by projecting myself.” In this case, Young uses nonsensical repetition and rhyme to imitate the feeling of being stuck in a stupor. The few lines that I quoted sent me searching for a metaphor that wasn’t there. Just as one starts to see light at the end of the tunnel, Young’s thought process changes again. It is in such strategies that Young gains notoriety in the world of poetic discourse.
ReplyDeletethanks for your comment. "just as one starts to see the light at the end of the tunnel, young's thought process changes again," great insight.
ReplyDeletesorry if i criticized your reading of hoaglund's article, i was a bit off-base.
no need to apologize. I didn't take any offense, we all have different opinions and personally, I enjoy being challenged.
ReplyDelete